Hom, Cristopher. A survey of the linguistic features of pejoratives, and the major theories—nominalism, contextualism, inferentialism, presupposition, conventional implicature, and thick semantic externalism.
Kennedy, Randall. New York: Vintage, Argues for the currency of the N-word in terms of a pragmatic difference in meaning depending on who says the word in what context.
Traditionally used as insult, the N-word can also be appropriated or used non-derogatorily in arts and entertainment. McGowan, Mary Kate. New York: Oxford University Press, Thus, oppressive speech can alter norms in a given practice or activity to be ones that prescribe oppressive behaviors.
Sosa, David, ed. Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, A collection of articles covering the state of art in the philosophical research on slurs.
Others address the question of how slurs relate to swear words, taboo words, and pejoratives. Croom M. Special Issue on Slurs. Language Sciences 52 : 1— A collection of articles, some on the linguistic nature of slurs, in particular on their semantic and pragmatic properties. Other articles are on their social and psychological nature. Hom, Christopher.
Symposium on Slurs. Analytic Philosophy A collection of articles that brings together a range of theoretical positions on the linguistic and social nature of slurs, with a focus on semantics versus pragmatics. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login. Rahman: Families who hold marginalized identities are already having a lot of these discussions, but we need to shift the focus to those in the dominant culture.
Those families need to have these conversations as well. Cano: Even if you have never had to deal with racism directly, you can still think about a time you were treated differently because of your gender or another trait. You can talk about that with your kids and how that experience made you feel. There are also some online resources that also offer helpful tips for parents, including the American Psychological Association and PBS. These discussions can be incredibly difficult, especially for parents who are triggered because of their own experiences.
If you need help, make sure to seek out support for yourself. What drives a parent to say yes or no to enrolling their child in research? When a surprisingly high percent Racing down a slalom course at top speed, she hit a patch Discrimination in Social and Political Philosophy.
Slurs in Philosophy of Language. Speech Acts in Philosophy of Language. Edit this record. Mark as duplicate. Find it on Scholar. Request removal from index. Revision history. Download options PhilArchive copy. PhilArchive page Other versions. Configure custom resolver. When Truth Gives Out. Mark Richard - - Oxford University Press. Slurring Words.
Li and D. Lutz, eds , Semantics and linguistic theory, Salt 20, Ithaca, clc Publications: Stalnaker , R. Tenchini , M. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer and H. Wiese, Pejoration , Amsterdam, John Benjamins, Whiting , D.
Yablo , S. Thomson and A. For some authors even the mention of slurs can be upsetting. I hope that the mention of slurs in this paper will not hurt the sensitivity of the reader. I just list the reference of the most important alternatives. For an analysis of the derogatory content of slurs in terms of truth-conditions, see: Hom and Hom and May , ; in terms of conventional implicatures, see Potts , McCready , Gutzmann , Whiting ; in terms of presuppositions, see: Lasersohn , Sauerland , Schlenker , Cepollaro , Cepollaro , Cepollaro and Stojanovic ; in terms of rules of use, see Jeshion a, b and Predelli ; in terms of speech acts, see: Langton , Frigerio and Tenchini ; in terms of purely pragmatic inferences, see Bolinger , Nunberg forthcoming.
For a deflationary approach, according to which the derogatory power of slurs does not depend on their meaning, see: Anderson and Lepore a, b. Because presuppositions are what is taken for granted by an utterance, they are typically not relevant to the qud. Persona Humana is a declaration of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith released in regarding sexual ethics. Bianca Cepollaro , « Slurs as the Shortcut of Discrimination » , Rivista di estetica , 64 , Bianca Cepollaro , « Slurs as the Shortcut of Discrimination » , Rivista di estetica [Online], 64 , online dal 01 avril , consultato il 12 novembre Vedi la notizia bibliografica nel catalogo OpenEdition.
Norme sulla privacy — Cookie Policy. Navigazione — Mappa del sito. Rivista di estetica. Sommario - Documento precedente - Documento successivo. Discrimination in philosophy. Bianca Cepollaro. Abstract The last decade saw a growing interest for hate speech and the ways in which language reflects and perpetuates discrimination, with two main focuses of interest: a linguistic-oriented question about how slurs encode evaluation on the one hand, and a philosophical and psychological question about the effects elicited by slurs.
Termini di indicizzazione Keywords: slurs , discrimination , presuppositions. Piano 1. The presuppositional account of slurs. What the presuppositional account of slurs can teach about the behavior of slurs. Testo integrale PDF 91k Invia tramite e-mail.
Introduction 1 In what follows, I will explicitly mention some slurring terms, as the treatment of slurs is severe I just list the reference The idea is Bibliografia Anderson, L. Note 1 In what follows, I will explicitly mention some slurring terms, as the treatment of slurs is severely impaired by the introduction of invented slurs or euphemisms.
Torna su. Per citare questo articolo Notizia bibliografica Bianca Cepollaro , « Slurs as the Shortcut of Discrimination » , Rivista di estetica , 64 , Notizia bibliografica digitale Bianca Cepollaro , « Slurs as the Shortcut of Discrimination » , Rivista di estetica [Online], 64 , online dal 01 avril , consultato il 12 novembre Autore Bianca Cepollaro Torna su. Navigazione Indice Autori Parole chiave. Chinese and Western philosophy in dialogue 71 The science of futures.
Promises and previsions in architecture and philosophy 70 Philosophy and Literature 69 empirical evidence and philosophy 68 trusting institutions 67 cultural exclusion and frontier zones 66 the auditory object 65 law and the faculty of judgement 64 discrimination in philosophy 63 intermediality and interactivity 62 Omologia e analogia 61 contemporaneo 60 postille a Ferraris 59 biodiversity supplemento al n.
Avanguardia, cinema, immagini 58 architettura 57 social objects from intentionality to documentality 56 the other s numero speciale, supplemento al n.
0コメント